|
Nepal
Telecommunications Authority
Quality of Service
Parameters
for
Basic Telephone
Service
(Approved by NTA on
12 Asadh, 2064 B.S. (26 June, 2007))
Quality of Service
Parameters
1.0
Background:
1.1
Section 14 of
the Telecommunications Act, 1997 (2053) authorizes Nepal
Telecommunications Authority for the determination and fixation of
Quality of Telecommunications Services and Standard of
telecommunications equipment and facility.
Pursuant to
Section 14 of the Telecommunication Act, 1997, the Authority has
determined the Quality of Service parameters and the corresponding
benchmarks for Wireline Basic Telephone Service.
1.2
‘Quality of Service (QoS)’
is the main indicator
of the performance of a telecom network and of the degree to which
the network conforms to the stipulated norms and standards specified
by the regulator or any other agency designated for the same. The
subscriber’s perception of the Quality of Service (QoS) is
determined by a number of performance factors. The purpose of laying
down Quality of Service Parameters is to:
o
Create
conditions for consumer satisfaction by making known the quality of
service which the service provider is required to provide and the user
has a right to expect. Thus, it protects the interests of
consumers of telecommunication services.
o
Measure
from time to time the Quality of Service provided by the Service
Providers and to compare them with the norms so as to assess the level
of performance.
1.3
Development of telecom technologies and reduction in the human
dependence of the telecom networks and customer services calls for
periodical review of the QoS parameters currently set, for
redefining the benchmarks as well as deletion of some existing QoS
parameters and addition of some new parameters based on the merits,
world trends and experience.
1.4 The
Authority has decided that the QoS parameter should be more
objective than subjective. There is a requirement to clearly define
method (with the clear mention of time period for averaging the
value of parameter) for measurement of the QoS parameters so that
there is homogeneity in the values of QoS parameters being submitted
by different operators to the regulator or published by the
operators as per the license requirements. This will make easy the
evaluation of the services being provided by different operators by
the regulator as well as the customers.
1.5 To make
the QoS parameters more comprehensive, the Authority has decided to
sub-divide the QoS parameters into following four broad categories:
-
·
Network Performance
-
·
Fault Incidence and
Repair
-
·
Billing Complaints
and Redressal
-
·
Customer Perception
regarding the Services
Each of the above
categories is being elaborated in the following paragraphs.
2. Basic Telephone
Service(Wireline)
2.1. Network Performance:
Network Performance is the most important QoS parameter for measurement
of quality of a Telecom Operator. Poor performance of a telecom network
would induce customer complaints and faults, thereby leading to customer
dissatisfaction towards the operator. The Network Performance parameter
is further subdivided into the following:
-
·
Service Access Delay
-
·
Call Completion Ratio
-
·
Grade of Service
-
·
Point of
Interconnection (PoI) Congestion
Service Access
Delay: Service Access Delay is defined as “the time between the last
dialed digit and getting the ring back tone” .
Call Completion
Ratio: Call Completion Ratio (CCR) is defined as “the
ratio of number of completed calls to the number of call attempts”.
Grade of Service:
Grade of Service (GoS) is defined as “the probability of call
failure over the junctions between switches due to non availability
of junctions”.
Point of
Interconnection (PoI) congestion: PoI congestion is defined as
“the ratio of calls failed over the PoI (between two operators/
licensees) due to unavailability of free circuits to the total call
requests for seizure of PoI circuit”.
Note: It is to be
noted that all the measurements of performance parameters should be
carried out during the “Time Consistent Busy Hour (TCBH)”.
TCBH is defined as “the one hour period starting at the same time
each day for which the average traffic of resource group is greatest
over the days under consideration”. ITU recommends analysis of 90
days to establish TCBH. Further, the above parameters are to be measured
by the operators within their own network (within a single exchange in
case of wire line networks). In view of the variety of different systems
in use at the different exchanges, it has determined that for the
present time, measurements of all the parameters for the wire line
networks shall be limited to the Parent Exchanges alone.
2.2.
Fault Incidence and
Repair:
Fault Incidence and Repair are categorized into the following:
-
·
Fault Incidences (No.
of Faults/ 1000 subscribers/ month)
-
·
Fault Repair is
further divided as fault cleared within
ü
24 Hours
ü
48 Hours
ü
72 Hours
ü
more than 72 Hours
2.3. Billing Complaints and
Redressal:
Billing complaints are categorized
into:
-
·
Billing Complaints
per 100 bills issued
-
·
Percentage of billing
complaints cleared within a month.
2.4. Customers Perception
Regarding the Services:
The Authority has determined to sub
divide this parameter into the following category:
-
·
Percentage of
customers satisfied with the network performance, reliability and
availability.
-
·
Percentage of
customers satisfied with the provision of service.
-
·
Percentage of
customers satisfied with billing performance.
-
·
Percentage of
customers satisfied with the help/enquiry services.
-
·
Percentage of
customers satisfied with the maintainability.
-
·
Percentage of
customers satisfied with the offered supplementary services
-
·
Overall Customer
Satisfaction
The Authority would determine the modalities of the customer survey.
3.0 Quality of
Service Parameters and its corresponding benchmarks:
In respect of the parameter "Provision of a telephone
after registration of demand", only those areas where telephone is
available on demand is taken into account. The operators should specify
such areas and the same should be widely publicized. If the telephone
can be provided on demand, the same should be provided within the
specified time frames. In all other cases, waiting list should be
maintained and the connections released in a non-discriminatory manner
as per the waiting list, objectively predetermined for various
categories.
In
view of the above, the Authority has determined the following QoS
parameters (along with benchmark values and period for averaging) for
Basic Telephone Service based on wire-line:
|
S. No. |
Parameters
|
Benchmarks
|
Averaged over a period of
|
|
1. |
Provision of a telephone after registration of demand |
100 % cases in < 5 working days, subject to technical
feasibility |
One quarter |
|
Network Performance: |
|
2 |
Call Completion Ratio (CCR) |
> 45 % |
One Quarter |
|
3 |
Grade of Service (GOS) |
< 1 % |
One quarter |
|
4 |
Point of Interconnection (PoI)
Congestion |
<1 % |
|
|
5 |
Response Time to the
customer for Assistance
i) % of calls answered (electronically) (IVR):
Within 30 Sec.
Within 60 Sec.
ii) % of calls answered by operator (voice to Voice):
Within 60 Sec.
Within 90 Sec. |
80%
95%
80%
90% |
One quarter |
|
6 |
Customer care
Promptness in attending
to customers request (95% of request)
-
Line Shifting
-
Service Disconnection*
-
Additional Facility
|
-
< 5 Working Days
-
By next working Day
-
By next working Day
|
|
|
Fault Incidence and Repair: |
|
7 |
Fault Incidences (No. of
Faults/ 100 subscribers/ month) |
<8 |
One quarter |
|
8 |
Fault Repair:
Fault cleared within |
|
One quarter |
|
|
·
24 Hours |
80% |
|
|
|
·
48 Hours |
95% |
|
|
|
·
72 Hours |
99% |
|
|
|
·
more than 72
Hours |
100% |
|
|
Billing Complaints and
Redressal: |
|
9 |
Billing Complaints per
1000 bills issued |
< 1 |
One quarter |
|
10 |
% of billing complaints
cleared within a month. |
>99% |
One quarter |
|
Customer Perception regarding the services: |
|
11 |
% of customers satisfied
with the network performance, reliability and availability. |
>90% |
|
|
12 |
% of customers satisfied
with the provision of service. |
>90% |
|
|
13 |
% of customers satisfied
with billing performance. |
>85% |
|
|
14 |
% of customers satisfied
with the help/ enquiry services. |
>85% |
|
|
15 |
% of customers satisfied
with the maintainability.
|
>90% |
|
|
16 |
% of customers satisfied
with the offered supplementary services |
>90% |
|
Top
|